<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tallest Tree Photo Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wendmag.com/blog/2009/09/29/tallest-tree-photo-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wendmag.com/blog/2009/09/29/tallest-tree-photo-ever/</link>
	<description>What the Wend Team is up to between issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. D. Vaden of Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.wendmag.com/blog/2009/09/29/tallest-tree-photo-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-5855</link>
		<dc:creator>M. D. Vaden of Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendmag.com/blog/?p=8830#comment-5855</guid>
		<description>GKS wrote that the redwood photo in the October 2009 Nat Geo is pretty much a copy of work by James Balog.

Seems that each is it&#039;s own work. Balog&#039;s photos of the redwoods are basically photo stitch, which is pretty much photography done by many others before him. Took a moment to realize which tree Balog took the Del Norte Titan image from.

The photo by Nichols is more clean and crisp, since its a more tightly fit merging of images. I like both Nichols and Balog versions. Someday, I&#039;d like to redesign my office in another room at home, and hang prints of both.

MDV
Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GKS wrote that the redwood photo in the October 2009 Nat Geo is pretty much a copy of work by James Balog.</p>
<p>Seems that each is it&#8217;s own work. Balog&#8217;s photos of the redwoods are basically photo stitch, which is pretty much photography done by many others before him. Took a moment to realize which tree Balog took the Del Norte Titan image from.</p>
<p>The photo by Nichols is more clean and crisp, since its a more tightly fit merging of images. I like both Nichols and Balog versions. Someday, I&#8217;d like to redesign my office in another room at home, and hang prints of both.</p>
<p>MDV<br />
Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GK5</title>
		<link>http://www.wendmag.com/blog/2009/09/29/tallest-tree-photo-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-5621</link>
		<dc:creator>GK5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wendmag.com/blog/?p=8830#comment-5621</guid>
		<description>This is pretty much a copy of the work James Balog has done in the past. See http://www.jamesbalog.com/portfolio/index.html and click the &quot;Tree&quot; section of the portfolio (you&#039;ll have to mouse over the icons to see the description).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty much a copy of the work James Balog has done in the past. See <a href="http://www.jamesbalog.com/portfolio/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesbalog.com/portfolio/index.html</a> and click the &#8220;Tree&#8221; section of the portfolio (you&#8217;ll have to mouse over the icons to see the description).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

